In re A.G. CA6
J.G. is the father of A.G., the child at issue in this juvenile dependency matter, in which the juvenile court terminated the father’s parental rights at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 permanency planning hearing.
On appeal, the father challenges the termination of his parental rights, contending: (1) no substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception did not apply; and (2) the juvenile court violated the father’s fundamental due process right of access to the court by failing to provide him with his requested accommodation for hearing loss. For reasons that we will explain, we will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re A.G. CA6