P. v. Bryant CA1/5
Appellant Marcus T. Bryant appeals from a judgment following a contested probation revocation hearing. Appellant’s counsel originally raised no issue on appeal and asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there were any arguable issues. (See Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant’s counsel advised appellant of his right to file a supplementary brief to bring to this court’s attention any issue he believes deserves review. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106.) Appellant has not filed such a brief. We directed the parties to file supplemental briefing regarding custody credits, previously waived by appellant, that were credited to appellant at his final sentencing. After consideration of that briefing, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Bryant CA1/5