legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.F. CA1/5
D.F. (Father) and J.D. (Mother) appeal from an order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, which terminated their parental rights and selected adoption as the permanent plan for L.F. (minor). Mother contends the court erred in terminating her parental rights because she had a beneficial relationship with the minor. Father joins in Mother’s argument and asserts that, if the termination of Mother’s parental rights is reversed, the termination of his parental rights should be reversed too.
We will affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale