P. v. Thompson CA3
Defendant Mario David Thompson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act). (See Pen. Code, § 1170.126.) He contends (1) the trial court erred in finding that resentencing him posed an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety and (2) the trial court should have applied section 1170.18’s definition of unreasonable risk of danger to public safety, and any failure of trial counsel to preserve this contention constitutes ineffective assistance. We conclude the trial court’s finding was not an abuse of discretion and it applied the appropriate definition of danger to public safety. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Thompson CA3