P. v. Xinol-Mendez CA4/2
Defendant and appellant Adiel Xinol-Mendez violated the probation condition requiring him, as a homeless probationer, to report daily in person—Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m.—to his probation officer. On appeal, defendant argues the trial court’s finding he violated probation must be reversed because it was based on a facially unconstitutional probation condition. Specifically, defendant asserts the condition requiring him, as a homeless probationer, to report daily in person violates the right of homeless probationers to travel, to obtain employment, and to be free from arbitrary and oppressive official action. We reject defendant’s contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Xinol-Mendez CA4/2