P. v. Bradford CA1/4
Robert Bradford appeals the trial court’s order, after a jury trial, extending his commitment to Napa State Hospital pursuant to Penal Code section 1026.5. Bradford contends the court erred in allowing two expert witnesses to testify at his trial about case-specific facts based on inadmissible hearsay as prohibited by People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez). We conclude that to the extent these expert witnesses testified to inadmissible hearsay, Bradford was not prejudiced by the erroneous admission of this evidence, and his constitutional rights were not violated. We affirm the order extending his commitment.
Comments on P. v. Bradford CA1/4