California Alliance Telecard v. Holly Distribution
Appellants California Alliance Telecard, Inc. (Telecard) and Riyadh Haddad (Haddad) appeal from an award of costs and attorney fees made in favor of defendants and respondents Holly Distribution Group, LLC and Mustapha Kiskou (collectively referred to in the singular as Holly) following a bench trial which ended in a defense verdict. Appellants contend on appeal that the award as to Haddad was improper procedurally because there was no notice to him of the filing of the motion, and the motion was never served on him personally. Alternatively, Haddad asserts that the award was not supported by sufficient evidence to allow the court to “pierce the corporate veil” and make him personally liable for the fees. We affirm.
Comments on California Alliance Telecard v. Holly Distribution