legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Nikosyan CA2/1
Following the denial of their motion to suppress evidence at the preliminary hearing (Pen. Code, § 1538.5 ), in which they argued that they had been illegally detained and searched, and following the trial court’s denial of their renewed motion to suppress (§ 1538.5, subd. (i)), Arman Nikogosyan (Nikogosyan) and Arsen Nahapetyan (Nahapetyan) (collectively, Defendants) pleaded nolo contendre to a single count of identity theft (§ 530.5, subd. (c)(3) ).
On appeal, Defendants contend the trial court erred in denying their suppression motions. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale