legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.W. CA2/5
S.O. (Mother) appeals from the jurisdictional findings and dispositional order made by the juvenile court. She argues there was insufficient evidence to support dependency jurisdiction over her two sons pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b)(1) and (j). In addition, she contends the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered her to participate in a psychological assessment as part of the family maintenance case plan. We affirm the jurisdictional findings and dispositional order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale