P. v. Farias and Guerrero
A jury convicted defendants of conspiracy and attempted robbery, and found true the allegations one defedant was vicariously armed and Guerrero used a gun during the crime. They argue the trial court committed instructional error when it omitted a specific intent requirement on the conspiracy charge. Guerrero also contends the court should have given a unanimity instruction on the use allegation. Finding no basis to overturn the judgment, court affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Farias and Guerrero