legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Penaloza CA2/8
Defendant Teodoro Penaloza appeals from his conviction for assault with a firearm and the subsequent jury finding that he was insane at the time he committed the offense. Defendant claims that his mental illness rendered him incapable of knowingly and intelligently waiving his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda) and therefore his statements to the police should have been suppressed. He further argues that the evidence was insufficient to show he did not act in self-defense. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale