legal news


Register | Forgot Password

C.G. v. Superior Court CA1/3
Petitioner is the Father of three children, a girl born in January 2011, a boy born in November 2011, and girl born in December, 2012. He challenges the juvenile court’s order setting a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 by arguing that (1) he was not provided reasonable reunification services and (2) the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied his request for a new appointed counsel. For the reasons given below, we deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale