legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Nicole V. v. Superior Court CA1/2
Nicole V. and Nathanial H. (when referred to collectively, petitioners) have filed separate petitions for an extraordinary writ, as authorized by California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, to set aside the order of respondent court that set a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 at which their parental rights may be terminated with respect to their infant son Levi. (Subsequent statutory references are to this code.) Their sole contention is that substantial evidence does not support the finding of respondent court that adequate reunification services were offered by real party in interest Alameda County Social Services Agency (Agency). Apart from information required to establish the general context, we summarize only those parts of the record necessary to resolve the precise issue presented.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale