legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Co. CA2/4
In this bail forfeiture case, Accredited Surety & Casualty Company (Accredited) appeals from the trial court’s order denying relief from bail forfeiture and granting summary judgment on the amount of its bond, plus costs. Accredited contends that the judgment must be reversed because Accredited was entitled to relief from forfeiture under Penal Code section 1305, subdivisions (g) and (j). In the alternative, Accredited contends that it was entitled to an additional 13-day extension of time under section 1305.4 before summary judgment was appropriate. We conclude that Accredited failed to satisfy subdivision (g), that subdivision (j) is irrelevant as to whether subdivision (g) was satisfied, and that although the trial court’s rationale in denying an additional 13-day extension was incorrect, the ruling was correct on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction to grant an extension. We therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale