legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.O. CA4/2
In this dependency case, the juvenile court took jurisdiction over the minor, S.O., based on substance abuse and domestic violence by defendant and appellant, Sh.O. (father). Father appeals from the court’s orders terminating his parental rights and denying his petition to reinstate his reunification services. He based his petition on evidence that he had completed a 90-day drug treatment program and had been clean for several months. He contends the court erred in finding no “change of circumstance” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388, subd. (a)) and concluding that renewed reunification services were not in S.O.’s best interests. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale