legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.G. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant J.C. (mother) is the mother of A.L., D.L., and T.G. Defendant and appellant S.G. (father) is the father of T.G. Both mother and father (parents) appeal from the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother’s sole contention is that notice pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) was insufficient. Father challenges the court’s finding that T.G. is generally adoptable. We reject father’s contention, but agree with mother’s. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale