legal news


Register | Forgot Password

M.B. v. Superior CA1/1
M.B. (Mother), along with fathers G.P. and R.G., petition for extraordinary relief under California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, asking us to set aside the juvenile court’s orders terminating family reunification services and scheduling a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to consider termination of parental rights and implementation of a permanent plan for the parties’ four children. Mother is the mother of three of the children, R.G.-B., E.G.-B., and G.P.-B. G.P. is the father of the two younger children, L.A. and G.P.-B. R.G. is the father of the two older children R.G. B. and E.G.-B. The parents contend that (1) substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court’s orders terminating reunification services, (2) substantial evidence does not support the court’s findings that reasonable services were offered, and (3) the court abused its discretion with respect to its visitation orders. We find the parents’ arguments unavailing and deny the

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale