Harris v. Fuller CA3
Nicholas Harris, appellant appearing in pro. per., appeals from an order denying his request for a three-year restraining order that would have prohibited his ex-girlfriend and housemate from harassing him. Appellant has filed a 61-page opening brief that is rambling, irrelevant, and largely unintelligible. Unfamiliar with the principles of law governing the trial court’s ruling and the limited scope of appellate review, appellant does little more in his brief than express frustration with his ex-girlfriend, the trial court, and the Domestic Violence Protection Act.
Comments on Harris v. Fuller CA3