legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Wholesome Choice Market v. Arefian CA4/3
This is an appeal from a judgment after a bench trial. According to the complaint, the underlying dispute arose out of the operation of a food court in a grocery store. Defendant Parviz Arefian owned defendant Paak Foods, Inc., which operated the food court in a grocery store owned by plaintiff Wholesome Choice Market, Inc. (Wholesome Choice). There was a dispute about money defendants owed, and the parties signed a settlement agreement setting forth a particular amount owed. Defendants failed to pay it. Wholesome Choice sued on the settlement agreement, and defendants cross-complained, arguing they signed the agreement under economic duress and that plaintiff had committed fraud. After a bench trial, the court adopted Wholesome Choice’s position and rejected Arefian’s claims and defenses. Arefian appealed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale