P. v. Ramos CA4/3
A jury convicted defendant Roberto Ramos of orally copulating a child. In this appeal, defendant argues that the trial court improperly admitted his confession. Defendant contends that during the first part of a police interview he was subject to a custodial interrogation without the protections of Miranda. Defendant further contends that the police engaged in a deliberate two-step strategy designed to undermine the protections of Miranda. (Missouri v. Seibert (2004) 542 U.S. 600 (Seibert).)
We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ramos CA4/3