Magco Drilling v. Natoma Family Housing CA1/1
After defendants Natoma Family Housing, L.P. and St. Joseph’s Family Associates, L.P. prevailed against plaintiff Magco Drilling, Inc.’s complaint for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, defendants filed a motion seeking to recover cost-of-proof under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420, based on plaintiff’s failure to admit certain requests for admission. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion, arguing the court erred in concluding they had waived the right to recover such costs. We affirm.
Comments on Magco Drilling v. Natoma Family Housing CA1/1