P. v. Rosales CA6
This appeal presents challenges to several common probation conditions. Defendant Javier Rosales pleaded no contest to a charge of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)), and was granted probation. He contends that three of the probation conditions imposed by the trial court are invalid: (1) an order that he stay 100 yards away from the victim, and the victim’s residence, vehicles, and place of employment; (2) a proscription on obtaining any new tattoos; and (3) a requirement that he obtain permission from his probation officer or the court before moving to a residence out of the county or leaving the state. Under the circumstances presented here, we find the challenged conditions comply with applicable legal standards. We will therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Rosales CA6