legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Vera v. US Bankcard Services CA2/4
David Vera signed an agreement with US Bankcard Services, Inc. for services relating to processing credit card transactions for Vera’s small businesses. US Bankcard itself did not provide credit card processing services; instead, another company, Elavon, Inc. provided those services. US Bankcard recruited merchants such as Vera who wanted credit card processing services, and sold Elavon’s services to those merchants.
In the context of the parties’ transaction, Vera signed a “Merchant Application,” which included a reference to Elavon’s “Terms of Service” located on the Elavon website. Vera was never provided a copy of the Terms of Service. In that document, there was an arbitration provision stating that all controversies were to be submitted to arbitration in Georgia and would be subject to Georgia law.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale