Aza Properties v. Union Bank CA3
After foreclosure on three properties owned by members of the Alizadeh family, the Alizadehs and defendants Union Bank and Unionbancal Mortgage Corporation (collectively the Bank) entered into a settlement agreement under which plaintiff AZA Properties (AZA) would purchase the properties from the Bank. When that agreement was not consummated, AZA brought suit against the Bank, alleging the Bank prevented the closing of the transaction. AZA appeals from the judgment entered after the Bank’s successful motion for summary judgment. AZA contends the trial court erred in (1) sustaining the Bank’s objections to a declaration offered in opposition to the summary judgment motion, (2) denying a continuance, and (3) denying a motion for reconsideration. We find no error and affirm.
Comments on Aza Properties v. Union Bank CA3