P. v. Amey CA1/3
Following a no contest plea, defendant Paul Amey, Jr. was convicted of first degree residential burglary and possession of burglar’s tools. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that one of the conditions of his probation, which required him to provide passwords for electronic devices, is both unreasonable under governing case law and unconstitutionally overbroad. We agree that the condition is overbroad and order it modified to conform to constitutional requirements.
Comments on P. v. Amey CA1/3