legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.W. CA1/3
S.W. is the mother of T.W., born in May 2014, and M.T.1, born in May 2015. M.T. is the father of M.T.1. Mother and father separately appeal from orders (one as to each child), dated April 27, 2017, in which the juvenile court denied mother’s request, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, for a reinstatement of reunification services, and terminated parental rights, thereby freeing both children for adoption. Mother seeks reversal of the termination orders, arguing that the juvenile court should have granted her section 388 request for reinstatement of her reunification services. Father presents no substantive argument, but contends that if mother is successful on her appeal and the orders terminating her parental rights are reversed, then the orders terminating father’s parental rights must also be reversed. Having considered mother’s substantive argument and finding no error in the court’s denial of her section 388 request for reinstatement of reunification s

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale