legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Livingston CA2/1
Appellant Warner Livingston challenges the trial court’s order denying his petition for recall of his sentence pursuant to section 1170.126 (Proposition 36). The trial court found that he was ineligible for resentencing on his conviction of evading the police because he was armed during the commission of that offense. (See Pen. Code, §§ 1170.126, subd. (e)(2), 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iii).) Appellant argues that insufficient evidence supported the court’s finding that he was armed. We disagree and affirm as to his evading conviction, but reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider its order on the application of Proposition 36 to appellant’s conviction for false imprisonment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale