legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ortega CA2/4
David Anthony Ortega appeals from the judgment entered following his guilty plea to one count of second–degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (c), and his admission of a gang allegation (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(c)). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441 (Wende), raising no issues, and asked this court independently to review the record. Appellant filed a supplemental brief. He contends that: (1) the prosecution failed to disclose material information regarding anticipated trial testimony of a prosecutorial witness; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) the trial court violated his constitutional rights under the sixth and fourteenth amendments by denying a continuance, leaving appellant with “no choice but to go to trial with [an ineffective] lawyer.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale