In re J.S. CA1/2
In May of 2016, the juvenile court found that J.S.—who was then more than 20 years of age—violated this condition, imposed lifetime sex offender registration, and ordered him committed to DJF. J.S. advances a number of arguments—the majority of which were not raised below—as establishing fatal infirmities in the violation, the commitment, and the registration requirement. We conclude there is no basis for overturning the commitment, and we thus affirm.
Comments on In re J.S. CA1/2