legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.P. CA2/2
N.B. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional order regarding D.P. (minor) based on Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d). She asks us to exercise our discretion to review the sufficiency of the evidence for certain subdivision (d) findings. According to mother, there was insufficient evidence that she knew minor was being sexually abused or was at risk of sexual abuse. Also, she claims there was insufficient evidence that she failed to protect him from sexual abuse.
We find no error and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale