legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Culross CA4/3
Appellant David Alexander Culross contends his conviction for robbery must be reversed due to instructional error and prosecutorial misconduct. He also argues there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s true finding on a prior serious felony allegation. We reject appellant’s arguments and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale