P. v. O’Neal CA2/4
Appellant Dijon O’Neal was convicted by a jury of oral copulation by force (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)(2)(A), count 1), penetration by foreign object (§ 289, sub. (a)(1)(A), count 2), and false imprisonment (§ 236, count 3). He appeals from the judgment, raising issues of Brady error, evidentiary error, erroneous release of a trial witness (the victim), and insufficiency of the evidence. We conclude his contentions lack merit, and affirm.
Comments on P. v. O’Neal CA2/4