P. v. Omar CA6
A jury convicted defendant Mohammed Omar of possession and transportation for sale of khat, a controlled substance. He argues the trial court erred by admitting statements in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and he contends the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument. He also argues for reversal of the judgment because the record on appeal does not include documents reviewed in camera by the trial court under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess). Finding no error and also no prejudice from the absent documents, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Omar CA6