Craig v. Cardona CA4/1
Following a bench trial, the court dismissed Samuel Craig, Jr.'s action in which he challenged the validity of his deceased father's will. The court found the action is barred by the statute of limitations because the will was properly probated more than 20 years earlier. Craig appeals contending the court erred in its findings because there is no established statute of limitation for the tort of intentional interference with expected inheritance and because Craig claims he did not discover the defendants' fraudulent actions until April 2014, less than a year before his action was filed. Craig failed to request a statement of decision and, therefore, we must imply the trial court made the necessary findings to support the judgment. Thus, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Craig v. Cardona CA4/1