legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.W. CA4/1
Mother appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her reunification services at the 12-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (f)). Mother contends the court erred in terminating her reunification services because the court extended Father's reunification services to 18 months (§§ 361.5, subd. (a)(3)(A), 366.21, subd. (g)(1)) and did not set a selection and implementation hearing (§ 366.26). We conclude the court had the authority to terminate Mother's reunification services notwithstanding the court's extension of Father's reunification services and Mother has not established the court abused its discretion in doing so.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale