P. v. Carrillo CA5
Appellant Rumaldo Andrew Carrillo was placed on probation after being found guilty of possession of marijuana for sale and cultivation of marijuana. He argues the electronic search condition imposed by the trial court as a condition of probation is unconstitutionally overbroad, and violates his constitutional right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. We reject his constitutional challenges because Carrillo failed to object to the condition in the trial court and thereby forfeited the right to argue on appeal the condition is unconstitutional. Nevertheless, we address and reject the contention on the merits.
Comments on P. v. Carrillo CA5