In re James K. CA5
Appellants James K. (father) and S.C. (mother) appealed from the juvenile court’s orders terminating their parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) as to their now 15-month-old son, James. After reviewing the juvenile court record, appellants’ court-appointed counsel informed this court they could find no arguable issues to raise on appellants’ behalf. This court granted appellants leave to personally file letters setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844 (Phoenix).)
Appellants filed letters but failed to set forth a good cause showing that any arguable issue of reversible error arose from the section 366.26 hearing. (Phoenix, supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Consequently, we dismiss their appeal.
Comments on In re James K. CA5