legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bahr
Defendant pleaded guilty in March 2001 to one count of stalking. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted appellant 36 months' probation. Defendant appeals from the August 2005 order finding him in violation of his probation, revoking probation and sentencing him to a two-year term in state prison with custody and good time credit for 501 days. Appellant contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion for substitution of appointed counsel, when it failed to read a letter he submitted or to rule on the motion for reconsideration that was included in the letter, when it considered hearsay testimony from his probation officer, and when it revoked his probation for failure to pay fines without making a finding concerning his ability to pay. Court affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale