Moghaddam v. Meghdadi CA3
Andrew Meghdadi appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside a default. He claims the trial court abused its discretion in rejecting his argument that the default should be set aside because of his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473.)
Because Meghdadi filed his notice of appeal weeks before the default judgment was entered, he has appealed from a nonappealable order and we will dismiss the appeal. But even if we were to address the merits of his claim, Meghdadi would not be successful on appeal because he has not provided us with an adequate record to establish that the trial court abused its discretion.
Comments on Moghaddam v. Meghdadi CA3