Stanman v. City of Los Angeles
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal following a bifurcated trial on statute of limitations grounds. The owner of a taxicab company brought this action against a city for refusal to grant appellant’s franchise to operate taxicabs in the city. After the first phase of trial on the respondent’s statute of limitations defense, the court announced a tentative ruling in favor of the appellant. At the beginning of the second phase, which was on the merits, the court announced its final decision on the statute of limitations issue, holding that appellant’s claim was barred. Appellant claims this was error and seeks reversal. Court found no error and affirmed the judgment.
Comments on Stanman v. City of Los Angeles