Clements v. Mainardi
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside a judgment in favor of respondent. Appellant contends the underlying judgment in a family law case was based on respondent’s perjury and fraud. Additionally, she maintains the lower court did not have jurisdiction over her separate property. Court concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to set aside the judgment and affirmed its ruling.
Comments on Clements v. Mainardi