legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cox CA3
Defendant Tony Marshall Cox appeals from multiple criminal convictions arising out of confrontations with his former wife and her boyfriend. He contends (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction for robbing his former wife’s cell phone; (2) the jury instruction for robbery erroneously described the crime’s elements, and his counsel rendered ineffective assistance for not objecting to the instruction; and (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by not instructing sua sponte on expert witness opinion. We affirm the judgment with directions to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale