P. v. Cox CA3
Defendant Tony Marshall Cox appeals from multiple criminal convictions arising out of confrontations with his former wife and her boyfriend. He contends (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction for robbing his former wife’s cell phone; (2) the jury instruction for robbery erroneously described the crime’s elements, and his counsel rendered ineffective assistance for not objecting to the instruction; and (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by not instructing sua sponte on expert witness opinion. We affirm the judgment with directions to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cox CA3