legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Turner CA5
This appeal is from a resentencing on remand following an earlier appeal. At issue is whether the court erred in reimposing two one-year enhancements based on prior prison terms, pursuant to Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b).
It did err. One of these one-year enhancements was based on the same prior offense as a five-year enhancement the court imposed under section 667, subdivision (a). This was a prohibited dual use. The other one-year enhancement was based on an offense that had been reduced to a misdemeanor prior to the resentencing hearing, pursuant to section 1170.18 (Proposition 47). At the time of the resentencing, this offense thus could no longer support the enhancement, which requires a felony conviction. Both enhancements, consequently, were unauthorized and are subject to correction at any time. We direct the trial court to strike them.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale