legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re William F. CA5
Richard F. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s May 12, 2017 orders granting the Stanislaus County Community Services Agency’s (Agency) Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions and suspending visits with his sons, 11-year-old William and eight-year-old Alfred (collectively the boys). Father also appeals from the June 13, 2017 order issued at a subsequent section 366.26 hearing for Alfred that terminated his parental rights as to Alfred. Father contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s findings that (1) his visits were detrimental to the boys, and (2) Alfred was likely to be adopted within a reasonable time. We reject father’s contentions and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale