legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.C.B. CA1/4
This is the third time we are called upon to review a juvenile court order in this case involving L.C.B. who became a court dependent in 2014 when she was a year old.
In September 2015, we directed the juvenile court to set aside an order scheduling a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to consider terminating the parental rights of L.C.B.’s parents, Carmen C. and Andrew B., because there was insufficient evidence that this family was offered six months of reasonable reunification services. However, in November 2016, we refused to set aside another order scheduling a section 366.26 hearing because by that stage in the case, these parents had been afforded reasonable services and yet L.C.B. could not be safely returned to their home.
This appeal is from a December 2016 order terminating the parental rights of Carmen and Andrew and selecting adoption as L.C.B.’s permanent plan.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale