legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Saldana CA2/8
Defendant Anthony Jesus Saldana appeals from the judgment after his convictions for assault with a firearm, shooting at an inhabited dwelling, two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon, and violation of a criminal street gang injunction. We hold that the gang enhancement applied to the second count of possession of a firearm is not supported by substantial evidence and must be vacated. We otherwise affirm the judgment of conviction. In light of recent statutory amendments granting courts discretion to strike or dismiss firearm enhancements under Penal Code sections 12022.5 and 12022.53, however, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. We also direct the trial court on remand to correct several other errors in sentencing and the abstract of judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale