legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.G. CA3
The minor C.G. appeals from the juvenile court’s orders modifying probation at a hearing to accept transfer of his delinquency case from San Francisco County. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 602, 750, 775.)
He contends the juvenile court had no jurisdiction to modify probation conditions at the transfer-in hearing, and various gang related conditions added by the juvenile court were unconstitutional and unreasonable. We conclude (1) the juvenile court had jurisdiction, and (2) the conditions in question did not violate the minor’s constitutional rights, and were reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale