legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Garcia
Defendant appeals his conviction, by jury, of the first degree murder. Appellant contends the10-year gang enhancement does not apply to a life sentence, that the trial court erred in imposing two firearm use enhancements, and that the 25-year firearm use enhancement is subsumed by the base term of life without possibility of parole. He further contends the trial court erred when it instructed the jury in terms of CALJIC No. 2.01, because the instruction impermissibly lowers the prosecution's burden of proof, and when it instructed with CALJIC No. 3.18, because the instruction does not adequately describe the caution with which accomplice testimony should be considered. Defendant further contends the trial court erred when it admitted statements he made to a police informant and that the finding he was a member of a criminal street gang is not supported by substantial evidence. Respondent correctly concedes the trial court erred in imposing the 10-year gang enhancement and more than one firearm use enhancement. Court struke the 10-year gang enhancement and stay the 20-year firearm use enhancement. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.




Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale