P. v. Horisk CA3
Defendant Tyler John Horisk pleaded no contest to driving under the influence and causing bodily injury to another. (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (b).) As part of a grant of probation, he was prohibited from using marijuana—including under a Proposition 215 recommendation —as well as entering a business or location where marijuana is the primary item for sale or use. Defendant appeals contending those conditions are invalid under the Lent test. We agree and will direct the trial court to strike or modify the conditions.
Comments on P. v. Horisk CA3