Anderson v. Miscall CA4/1
Ivy Anderson and Edward Moran filed a malicious prosecution complaint against Laurence Miscall, Jr., claiming Miscall brought three unsuccessful actions against them without probable cause and with malice. Miscall moved to strike the complaint under California's anti-SLAPP statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) The trial court denied the motion, finding Anderson and Moran met their burden to show a probability of prevailing on the cause of action with respect to at least one of the prior actions.
Comments on Anderson v. Miscall CA4/1